Thursday, July 03, 2008

Ryan Recommends


We watched this film for the second time last night, and I must say that I absolutely loved it. Written for the screen and directed by P.T. Anderson (Magnolia, Punch Drunk Love), "There Will Be Blood" is a movie that gets even better with age. Some have told me that it moved too slowly for them, but to me the pacing was just right and the acting was completely brilliant. Plus, with the music score being done by Johnny Greenwood of Radiohead, there was always something for my brain to be focused on. If you're going to invest 2.5 hours in a film, I cannot think of many films that have come out in recent years that would be more worth the investment.


Based on the book by Jonathan Safran Foer (Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close), "Everything is Illuminated" has become one of our all-time favorites over the past 2 years. It is beautifully shot, with plenty of dry wit and heartfelt family history to move you through. The music is extremely memorable, and as far as off-beat comedies go this is certainly one of the best out there. I liked it much better than other options such as "Running with Scissors" and "Winter Passing." Being that I am not an Elijah Wood fan, this recommendation should mean even more than if I were suggesting a Phillip Seymour Hoffman film (my favorite actor). See it, and enjoy it. Then go buy some Gogol Bordello records. :)


"The Darjeeling Limited" is the 5th movie from Wes Anderson (Bottle Rocket, Rushmore, Royal Tenenbaums, Life Aquatic), and for those who love his work it definitely did not disappoint. Shot in India, this beautiful story of 3 brothers on a "spiritual voyage" is hilarious, and yet rich with symbolism. I had concerns that Anderson was treading over the same material too often (white boys in the state of arrested development) but this movie still shed fresh light for me and was definitely worth making. I would suggest that you see this movie if you like dark comedy, family dysfunction, or India. ;)



"Lars and the Real Girl" was a little off-putting to me at first. Am I actually going to watch a guy buy a sex doll and then convince himself that she's real? Is that a movie?? But, I must say, I was terribly wrong to doubt this film. Not only were my worst fears not realized, but I was moved by the community aspects within the film. Ryan Gosling does a fine bit of acting, and although it is certainly quirky in nature, this movie is far from being non-accessible. It is not emotionally turbulent, it is not highly disturbing, it is merely a story of figuring out what it means to be human. And it's good.




"Paris, Je Taime" is a very unique film. It is comprised of 18 five minute films, all with different directors and different actors with different stories. One main thing in common: Paris is the backdrop. I loved this film and would certainly argue that it is one of the better ones made in the past 2 years. It is in French with English subtitles as you might expect, and the beauty and humor within this film makes it quite memorable indeed. Far from the norm, and yet not far from home, I would certainly suggest that you check out this movie.




This is not an exhaustive list by any means (honorable mentions would include "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly", "King Corn," "Manderlay" and "The Squid and the Whale"), they are just some films over the past few years that have not seen incredible box office success but yield great rewards for those who invest the time. If you have any recommendations for me (or critiques of the ones I have enjoyed), please share with us by all means.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Super Tasters Taste More


"It's WHAT you like, not what you ARE like, that's important." Rob Gordon, High Fidelity

Sharing your taste with somebody can be a great way of letting them get to know you. Example: If you know that my favorite movie is "Life is Beautiful" and that I have no desire to see the new "Incredible Hulk" movie, you've learned something about who I am. If I told you that I loved ALL movies, what would you learn? Well, either that I am a liar, or that I'm incredibly boring. Either way, it hurts your desire to continue getting to know me.

That point seems pretty obvious to people when we talk about books or films, but I frequently get responses like this in regards to music.

People tell me that they love ALL music. They might go as far as to eliminate a genre or two (mainly country or rap) so that there is SOME dimension to their personality from the statement they've provided. One problem is that it's not true. The other problem with this answer is what it represents. We WANT to be viewed as open-minded, broad thinking people who have expansive tastes and are truly up for anything. You're not. I might go as far as to say that you'll LISTEN to anything. But love? No.

If you love everything than the word no longer has meaning. It does my wife no good if I love her if I also love ALL women and do not differentiate between them. Why do I love my wife? Aren't there qualities I see in her that makes her stand out, making her special to me? Absolutely. I might also love my sister, but it will be quite different from the way I love my wife. After that, I might love my friend, but my love for her would also be very different than the love I have for my wife and for my sister. There are varying degrees, and then at some point I'm going to bump into a woman that I don't particularly like being around. Maybe I don't hate, but I certainly don't love.

This is true of music if you really love any of it. It is good to know your tastes, and to think critically about them. Not so that they remain static and you preserve your favorites forever and never evolve! I believe it's possible for you to LEARN to love a certain piece of music, or a certain style of singing, or a particularly strong power chord. But you should figure out why you love something and don't care for something else, or you'll never learn anything. People want to "find themselves" or discover who they really are. Well, a window into that insight is lying right in front of you with your taste.

It actually can be a bit scary, looking yourself in the mirror and examining what you see. Maybe you like "Dream Theater" more than you think you should. Maybe you didn't like "Citizen Kane" as much as you thought you were supposed to. It can make you feel a little vulnerable putting yourself out there with any sort of opinion. But out there is where it happens, and it's where you belong. Don't hide behind a bland sheet of fake-love. Be real, be honest, and be humble. Your favorite song when you were 3 is probably not your favorite song today, so there's a very real possibility that your tastes may change. But knowing where you are today is still cool, and letting me get to know where you are is a form of intimacy, and without it our friendship is basically limp. So.... quit giving me the weak hand-shake. Just shake it!

Sunday, June 08, 2008

Matters of Music


People LOVE music, right? It's rare that I come upon a human being who doesn't claim to have a love for music, it almost feels cold and foreign if they don't make that claim. They also acknowledge that music has impacted their lives in some way, and that they certainly wouldn't want to live without music. And yet, with all of these people telling me how much they care deeply for music, it's even more rare that I find somebody who truly does.

Let me explain.

If you love something, you show a devotion to it. You VALUE it. You would not stand by while it was abused and do nothing. And yet, not only are we not standing up for music, but often we find ourselves contributing to the abuses with our own actions. What is he talking about?? What abuses? I will tell you.

Music has become a form of consumption. Therefore, the qualities that have become the most important to us regarding music are similar to that of any other consumption item in our culture. Convenience is huge. We refuse to go out of our way anymore, as the internet has made music so unbelievably accessible over the past 10 years. We also want it on our terms. Meaning, if I don't want an album but I want just 1 song, I expect to be able to get just that song for about a buck or less. We're actually starting to expect it for less (meaning free) more often than before.

The market WILL meet these demands, music consumers out there. Oh, it already has and it will continue to push towards what we demand, towards what we VALUE. Look familiar? The form itself vs. a CD is not what's important, it's what is written on the walls between the lines.

We will compress the heck out of the quality of your track so that you can fit as many tracks into the space provided as possible. What are we saying as consumers when we buy this? We would rather have the convenience than the quality.

Now, above I am talking about the quality of the recordings diminished when crunched into the typical MP3 format on iTunes. Here is a more frightening reality to me: We are losing out on the quality of the art itself. By only buying individual tracks more and more, artists are not able to afford to put the time and energy into deeper work that requires patience and time to un-lock. It will truly be the age of the "single" and the time of the album will be lost in the sauce. If we all just bought tiny corners of great paintings, then pretty soon large canvas paintings would go away and they would just sell buttons.

Finally, even with large record labels dying and more indie artists out there to support than ever before, we have still found a way to make sure the artists remain screwed by a giant company. The support we could show them through buying their art directly would be immense, but instead we give almost all of it to a huge company that created no music whatsoever. What did they do for us, again? Oh yeah, convenience. I suppose having all the music I own fit into my back pocket is worth the instant slashing of quality, the slow death of great long lasting album-makers, and taking the money out of the hands of those who created this thing we so dearly love. ;)

What am I suggesting? If you love music, VALUE it as such. Do whatever you can to support the artists who create the works that you love. Uphold the quality of the work and don't compromise the integrity of the music for a slightly more convenient way of experiencing it. The new technology isn't evil by any means. But when we sell something that's more important to get it, something is wrong. Remember what you love about music, what your life would be like if it wasn't there for you, and then give it it's due. Or just stop saying that you love music so much, because it simply isn't true. :)

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Faith in Chaos

Do you have a desire within you to pursue answers to questions that are bigger than yourself? When you get a little closer to the truth, do you notice anything happening within you? I believe that most human beings long to know answers to questions that are bigger than themselves, and that no human vessel is equipped to carry all the answers. So, is it an "ignorance is bliss" type of existence? Where we let these questions fall away, because in the end we cannot comprehend it all? I think not.

There is something critically important in the journey for discovering truth, and if you ignore the quest, you miss life. This is true no matter where you are along the path. If you're a child, you ask tons of "silly" questions, seeking to know more about a world of which you know nothing. If you have been pursuing truth all your life and are considered "wise" by many, you seek to understand the subtleties of the truth between the lines. Basically, the one thing you never do is remain idle forever. That is not a journey. That is a make-out spot for lonely old perverts who would rather make love to the knowledge they think they have forever than to step outside of the car and look over the cliff. The implication is that if you are not seeking truth of some sort, you are content with the truth you have and see no reason for more.



In the film "Pi" we see a character (Max) driven to madness and immense physical pain by the truth he was encountering. We understood that his afflictions were not solely brought on by the truth itself, but also by his obsession for it. The underlying assumption is that the closer we get to truth (or reality), the more we are captivated by it and burn to live within it. It changes us. However, if truth leads you to pride, or to forsake the life around you, you have missed something within the truth you have sought. The character Saul (Max's mentor) persists that Max needs to take things in perspective. Max believes that Saul has forsaken the journey of understanding, when in fact Saul is fully engrossed in it. He is understanding the beauty of life through animals (his fish). He is understanding the joy and burden of love and friendship by trying to save his friend (Max) from his own destruction, which he knows is just around the corner. Saul is still interested in larger than life questions, but only within the context of love and humanity. It was the pursuit of knowledge alone, without love, that threatened to un-do both characters. The fact that Max puts a drill to his head to escape reality is not a conclusion that truth must be avoided, but that it must be undertood carefully, and with tons of humility.



Acknowledging that we are limited should be the start of humility, not the end of the journey. Beauty, truth, reality, these things bring fruit, love and life into the world. We need to pursue them. If you notice that you have been stagnant, and that maybe you believe you have "truth" pretty figured out (or that you don't care anymore), I urge you to get out of the car. Stop making out with the kernel of life that you have inside of you, and look over the cliff. The world is out there, and we need you.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

The Envelope Please....


What is the greatest acting performance you have ever seen? What made it so great? I would be curious to hear from everybody what ranks highly on their lists. Several performances come to my mind, so I have decided to make a top 10 list. If you have 10, you can tell me 10. If you have 3, you can tell me 3. If they're not in order because you have a hard time ranking, just tell me performances that you love. Here is my list, from 10 down to 1

10. Cuba Gooding Jr. - Radio
9. Anthony Hopkins - Silence of the Lambs
8. Robert DeNiro - Awakenings
7. Phillip Seymour Hoffman - Capote
6. Sean Penn - I am Sam
5. Emily Watson - Breaking the Waves
4. Leonardo DiCaprio - What's Eating Gilbert Grape?
3. Ben Kingsley - House of Sand and Fog
2. Ellen Burstyn - Requiem for a Dream
1. Bjork - Dancer in the Dark

If you can pick up a theme, I have the potential to be greatly moved by somebody with a handicap (so does the American public). The only other major connection is that there are 2 of my top 5 performances that take place in a Lars Von Trier film. The highest ranked performance belongs to Bjork in her performance in Dancer in the Dark, which is the film we just recently watched at M.O.M. 2 of my top 3 performances came by supporting actors, isn't that a little weird?

So look at yourselves, what would you put on your list? I want to see some comments here, let's get some thought trains going as to what moves us and why.

Sunday, November 05, 2006

Who's his chiropractor?

Last week (yeah, I know, I should have written sooner) we watched one of my favorite movies, El Espinazo del Diablo, a ghost story set in a Spanish orphanage during the Spanish Civil War. For those of you who don't habla Espanol, El Espinazo del Diablo is Spanish for The Devil's Backbone. It was directed by Guillermo del Toro, probably best known in the U.S. for Mimic, Blade II, and Hellboy. He also wrote and directed a film called Cronos, a fascinating reworking of the vampire mythos.

If you haven't seen any of del Toro's films, I would highly recommend all of them, with the unfortunate caveat, however, that they may be classified as horror movies. I say unfortunate because I think the horror genre is one that many people simply dismiss out of hand.

So I'd like to begin discussion with a few questions:

1. If you avoid horror, why?

2. If you enjoy horror, why?

3. What horror movies/stories do you enjoy, and have you watched any that you wish you hadn't?

Del Toror's next film, Pan's Labyrinth, comes out in December. I've only seen the trailer, but I think it's my favorite movie ever.

Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Door County Trip

Mandy and I were in Door County WI for the last 5 days, staying at a place called the Birchwood Lodge. We had a fantastic trip and I am here to recount what I can so that you all can vicariously have a vacation as well. enjoy!

First off, I made a mix CD (of course) for this trip and we listened to it quite often while we were there. So to kind of 'take you there' in your mind, I will show you the track list of the mix.

1. Everybody's Talkin' -Harry Nillson
2. Golden - My Morning Jacket
3. She Just Wants to Be - R.E.M.
4. Up shit creek again - Tom Waits
5. I Guess Things Happen that Way - Johnny Cash
6. Girl - Beck
7. Pillar of Davidson - Live
8. Us and Them - Pink Floyd
9. Black Swan - Thom Yorke
10. City of Delusion - Muse
11. Gong - Sigur Ros
12. Alice Childress - Ben Folds
13. Wasted - Martin Sexton
14. To Be Alone With You - Sufjan Stevens
15. Within You - Ray Lamontagne

We arrived Thursday afternoon, unloaded the car into our 2nd floor grand suite which includes: King Size Bed, full kitchen, whirlpool, TV/DVD, HUGE walk-in shower with 3 heads, dining room table and living room area.

The first thing we wanted to do after getting unpacked was to take a long walk along the water and soak in the scenery:





We took our time, walking through backroads with paths laden with leaves and small doogies with their owners (that sounds like the dogs were dead, but they weren't). The smells of Wisconsin were filling our noses in the perfect way. And so the vacation was underway.


Well, after about an hour of walking around, we decided (of course) that we needed to get a great cup of coffee and play some chess. So we walked down the road to a great local shop called "Leroy's Water Street Cafe"

While we were playing chess, a group of folks came in and I overheard one of them telling the barista that he was from Pennsylvania. Well, being from PA, my ears perked up a little. When they were walking by our table I thought of asking where in PA they were from, but then for some reason I changed my mind and didn't say anything. As they walked by, one of the guys asked Mandy who was winning the chess match. Well, with the conversation already started I went ahead and asked the man where in PA he was from. "Clarion," he said. This is only 30 minutes from my hometown, Grove City, so we chatted for a bit about that area and what not. I thought it was a cool enough connection, my mind is starting to go back to the chess game. Then two of them, a husband and wife, say that they're not from Clarion, they're from Michigan and are living in Wheaton, IL. I tell them "I work in Wheaton!" It turns out that not only have they been to my Caribou several times, they are close friends with one of my employees, Christina. This is a pretty wild connection from the seemingly unrelated (non PA) couple that was on the sidelines of the conversation until now.

So through chatting with them, we discovered a great place to go and watch the sunset that evening:

They also told us of a great restaurant called Mr. Helsinki's, which was in the upstairs portion of a store in one of the villages there. Delcious food! Here is Mandy enjoying her fondue and tomato/cheese crepe we had for dinner:

After that, Mandy soaked in the whirlpool tub and I watched the Tigers beat the Yankees. A great end to our first evening there.

The next morning, we went to breakfast at a Swedish restaurant called "Al Johnson's." This place is famous for its roof being covered in grass and for having goats graze on it all day. It's quite amusing:



Then, upon the suggestion of a barista at Leroy's, we immediately hauled out to the Peninsula State Park, which is about 5 minutes from our hotel. When we arrived we rented bikes (wish we had our own!) to ride through the park. It was completely awesome. Not only were the smells of the forest wonderful, but the scenery was breath taking. The pictures don't do it justice, but here's what we captured just during the ride:

Then at the pinnacle of this 12 mile ride we took, we came upon Eagle's Tower (and when I say "came upon" I mean more that we "huffed and puffed up massive hills and sweated our tushes off upon it")

From the top of this tower, we were able to see a LONG ways off. It was amazing. Incidentally, the tower was wavering a little the whole time we were on it with 50 million kids who wanted to get to the top first. That, compiled with my natural distaste (that means I pee myself) for heights, means that Eagle Tower had it's pro's and it's con's.

Here's what the top of the tower held for our eyes:




We ate lunch at the top of the mountain, then rode down the rest of the way. After that, we (of course) went and checked out a different coffee shop nearby called "Drink Coffee"
This shop was nice, it had a computer with free internet access for customers with which I sent my 2 emails while I was away. Mandy and I tried out a total of 4 coffee shops, Leroy's being our favorite by far. One day we were exploring different villages looking for their coffee shops (of course) when I decided to ask the owner of an ice cream shop where a great coffee shop in that town might be. This merchant told me that she sold coffee there. I said "No, I'm looking for a sit down, coffee shop type atmosphere where we can read and stuff." She pointed to her one table in the corner next to a big gumball machine. "You're lookin' at it." Mandy said later that I didn't do a very good job at hiding my disgust.

That night we went to a fantastic restaurant on the water called "The Shoreline." It opens at 5 PM and when we got there at 4:45 there was already a line 20 people deep, shivering and waiting to get inside. Here's why... (our view while we ate)


Back at the hotel, we watched 3 movies during the trip (Thank you for Smoking, Tristram Shandy, and Psycho) all of which were good. We swam in the pool downstairs (which we had all to ourselves) and soaked in the hot tub. We watched the Yankees, Padres, Twins and Dodgers get eliminated from the playoffs (I especially enjoyed watching the Yankees go down).

The morning we left, we went to have brunch at the "White Gull" inn. Mandy had Blueberry pancakes and I had Cherry Stuffed French Toast (unbelievable). As we were leaving, I overheard (I eavesdrop) these 2 little boys talking to each other. The first boy said "I bet you I'm gonna be in the Book of World Records." "Why?" asked the 2nd child. "Well, in a couple of years I will... (he puts his fingers up representing a headline) for being The First Man To Not Have Chicken Pox.... EVER."

Mandy and I believe that this has been our best trip we've ever taken, from start to finish. On the drive home she discovered her dream candle shop (in which I spent an hour pretending to be the most patient husband known to man). If any of you feel that this trip is something you'd ever like to do, the website for the lodge we stayed in is: www.birchwoodlodge.com and now you have the names of some pretty awesome places to go while you're there. If you're not interested, well hopefully this was entertaining enough for you.

I needed this trip. Here's a before and after picture so you get the idea how badly I needed a short vacation:

Sunday, October 01, 2006

Dark Side of the Rainbow

















Last night we combined 2 forms of media into one experience by watching the Wizard of Oz on Mute while listening to the Dark Side of the Moon turned up loud. I personally have done this many times before, but half of the people there had never done it, and one had no idea why we were.

Here's why we did it:

There is a widespread rumor that when Pink Floyd made Dark Side (1974) they wrote it as an alternate soundtrack to the Wizard of Oz (1939). Some Pink Floyd members refuse to comment on the rumor, and some have denied its validity. Either way, there is mystery surrounding it, and we wanted to see it for ourselves.

How we did it:

At the very beginning of the film, the MGM lion comes on and roars three times before the start of the film. right after the 3rd roar, you press play on the album. then mute the TV. So it begins. But the album is only 42 minutes long, while the film is an hour and 40 minutes. So you play the album on a loop and watch it 2.5 times through, all the way to the end of the film.

What we discovered:

We discovered several connections between the album and the film sporadically throughout the film. The main meat of the connections is found the first time through the record. I'm not going to go into detail as to the connections themselves; you'll have to come up with your own. We didn't have any conclusive evidence to support the rumor. At the same time, we found enough to make denying it difficult.

We also discovered that the album changes the mood of the movie dramatically. Compared to what we typically took from the movie, the new soundtrack gave us new impressions. Likewise, the album takes on new life when heard in conjunction with the film. But if our minds are in a duel as to how we're to feel while we're experiencing these 2 medias at once, the audio tends to beat the visual. Meaning that we tend to interpret what our eyes see by understanding what our ears are hearing rather than the other way around. Very fascinating. Especially since we are familiar with the film enough to KNOW what is going on and our minds are still pulled into interpreting it differently because of the change in sountrack.

Who all has tried doing this?

If so, what did you discover?

Jillmarie, thank you for bringing the coffee from Greenleaf, always a big hit!

Saturday, August 26, 2006

Thus Far...

frazy.comfrazy.comfrazy.com
frazy.comfrazy.comfrazy.com
frazy.com

These are the films that we have tackled so far. What has been the most interesting? What has been the most impactful? Which ones did you dislike? Has M.O.M. helped you in any way up to this point?


Thursday, August 24, 2006


"Jenny"


"Business Time"



"Hiphopapatamus vs. the Rhymenoceros"



Get this video and more at MySpace.com


It's been a long time since I've found a band like this. If anybody knows of how i can get ahold of this show, please let me know.

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

The Sexy Leading Lady

What does it mean to be a beautiful woman? I'm sure we've all been told how young girls feel pressure from the media (pop culture) to look a certain way, to have a certain kind of body, that sort of thing. What effect do the women on big screens and magazines have on men? Does it effect a guy's decision to watch a movie if there is a "sexy leading lady" involved? You bet your bottom booty that it does. Which is why they're being featured more and more. Marilyn Monroe might have been the first sex icon, but she's nowhere near the last. There are really too many to count these days- we do need to appeal to all viewers.

First, let's talk about guys. One of them will say to me "So what if I think she's attractive and want to watch her movie? It's not an insult to them if I think they're sexy." Even if it turns them on to turn you on, it's still abusing them. Pretend for a minute that you fully agree with me. Not only do we need to protect these women from being misused, we need to protect ourselves from falling victim to it. It shouldn't take having a little girl of your own being oggled at the strip bar to make us realize that somewhere along the lines, our thought patterns concerning women might be a bit bad.

Now, for the girls. It's amazing how many times women try to take steps forward, and it turns out to be more of a step to the side, or just slightly backward even. First, I don't think you need me to tell you that you don't need to reveal more of your physical body to be more physically beautiful. By conducting yourself in a way that reveals more and more, it teaches men to think of you as something that they can attain at no cost. Have more respect for yourself and your fellow women- men should treat you better as a result.

One point on the whole "women's lib" movement. It seems that the goal from women has been to establish that they can do things every bit as good as men can, and therefore should be honored and celebrated just as much. While it may be true that women can do everything men can and vice versa, what if it's not? Does that mean that women shouldn't be honored and celebrated just as much? Or if it turns out that they can do everything better than men, should men not be celebrated for who they are? What if we were to say that women need to be honored and celebrated and appreciated no matter what they can or can't do? If you try to establish respect on the basis of being equal in all things, what happens if a guy is stronger than you? Should your respect take a dive?

Honestly, I'm embarrassed to be a guy sometimes because I know the way that we think. I'm not up here preaching- I know that I'm guilty of it, which is how I understand it so well. And even if I was preaching, establishing that I don't practice what I preach is no reason to disregard the message. Guys need to learn who women are and how they're to be treated. But women need to learn who women are and how they're to be treated, too.

Friday, August 04, 2006

Coldcall Coldplay

Hey everybody, how have you all been? We've been traveling a lot, which is why we didn't get to meet in July. But we're back and ready to roll again with some exciting ideas to take us through the rest of this first year of M.O.M.

Our next meeting time is Friday, August 18th at 7 PM at Backthird Audio. Bring anything that's tasty to eat, or bring a friend (who may or may not be tasty to eat. actually, they probably taste of chicken).

So what has been happening this summer? The media is having a field day with Mel Gibson. Hollywood is making its fair share of terrible summer smash blockbuster hits (Superman Returns tops my list that I've seen). All is well in the world. There is a new film coming out (The Fountain) by Requiem director Darren Aronofsky. I'm curious.

I got a call yesterday from a charity asking me to donate. I told them that I was sorry but to please not call back. The man told me that he would call back. I said "No, I'm serious, do not call me back." He said, "I'm calling back."
"No do not call me back, I mean it." (my voice is rising)
"I'm calling back."
"No, don't." (stern business voice)
"Is your wife there?"
"No, she's not and don't call back for her either." (slight tone of amusement showing through)
"Fine, I won't call back."
"Thank you. Goodbye."
"Bye...... (right before I hang up I hear) but i'm calling back."


I'm at a loss. Does this kind of behavior convince anyone to actually give them money? I'm currently on hold as I write this with SBC (have been for over 23 minutes) trying to get a 50 dollar gift card that was supposed to be sent to me 4 months ago. I'm actually conference calling with 2 different departments (you can imagine the type of mood this is putting me in).

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Put that in your Pipe

Mandy and I just got back from a 4 day music festival called Bonnaroo down in Tennessee last night. We saw so many great bands in such a short period of time it was almost too much to fully take in. The list of bands that we saw are as follows (in order)

The Motet
Cat Empire
Andrew Bird
Ben Folds
Mike Gordon
Oysterhead
Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers
My Morning Jacket
Buddy Guy
Elvis Costello
Beck
Radiohead
Bela Fleck and the Flecktones
Matisyahu

There were tons more to choose from, but those were all of the bands that we got to see. There were over 80,000 people there, it was outdoors and extremely hot.

During Tom Petty my friend Sean got a big bug in his eye which caused him irritation. So he reached for a nearby bottle of water to wash it out, only to realize that what he had grabbed was a bottle that contained vodka, not water. He discovered this AFTER he had poured it down his eye socket. Several times during the festival I was just handed drugs out of the blue. I didn't know the person offering, I didn't ask for any, they just went out of their way to try to bring the drugs my way. Turning them down was also funny b/c you could tell they weren't used to that response. I'd say about 90% of the people in there were using on some level during the shows. it might heighten their experience, but it doesn't have the same effect on people with clear heads. It's another case of etiquitte, but this time it's watching a concert. and guess what, I don't like distractions. I came there to see Radiohead, not the stoned guy behind me yelling "Go Kanes!" randomly at the top of his lungs during quiet parts of their songs.

How will these kinds of problems ever go away? First, we need to be the ones who aren't the offenders of these crimes. Once that is taken care of, we need to keep all of our friends in check. If it was one of my friends yelling out, it would be my job to either spank him or escort him out of the facility like a crying baby in church. They do these kinds of things b/c most people laugh at their shout outs, instead of clubbing them between the buttocks which should be standard practice for this sort of behavior. It's just like in kindergarden, we don't want to encourage the bully to pick on the dweeb, well we are the dweeb. So let's stand up for art and not let it be ravaged and plundered by people who will take everything wonderful out of it and try to roll it up in their doobie.

Wednesday, May 31, 2006

I'm the best there is at what I do (or in this case, the only one)


This weekend I went to see X-Men: The Last Stand. I thought it was great, but that's not the subject of this post. What I wish to discuss is movie etiquette and etiquette in general.

As the film started, someone in one of the front rows opened a cell phone that blinked blue lights that could probably be seen from Asteroid M and definitely distracted me and those I was sitting with. The last time I went to the movies, a group of pre-teens in front of me sent each other text messages throughout the entire movie. So I had to make a choice: do I try to ignore it and end up annoyed throughout the whole movie? or do I do something about it?

I chose the latter. "Turn of your phone!" I yelled. He did. And immediately, I could feel the tension in the theater. My wife whispered, "I can't believe you just did that."

Why is it that those who confront rudeness are made to feel uncomfortable while the feelings of rude people are protected? A computer-animated car had just told us to turn off our phones (and if the word of an anthropomorphic automobile isn't authoritative, I don't know what is). Did this guy think that it meant everyone but him?

Let's make this a two-fold discussion:

1. What is acceptable movie etiquette? Feel free to include theater, home theater, and discussions with people who may or may not have seen the movie.

2. What should our response be when someone trespasses the boundaries?

And just for fun, what sort of movie rituals do you have? If I like a movie a lot, I'll stay in the theater until the blue ratings screen comes up.

Sunday, May 28, 2006

"What's up, Doc"umentaries?


Pardon the silly title, I think I'm missing my father and my friend Josh so every pun in the world seems to bring them closer.

So last night we watched "Born into Brothels" which was our first Documentary style film. We talked some about this form of media last night, but I'd like to push into it a little further (surprised?) on here. By the way, I want to thank you all for making last night so much fun and so interesting. It was great to have some new people there as well as some familiar faces.

Regardless of the content, the Documentary format changes whatever you're watching compared with a normal fiction story. We established last night that there is no such thing as an unbiased presentation, whether it's a movie or a documentary or the evening news. If a human is involved there is bias. But what about ourselves? We're quick to judge the motives of the person deliverying the story, but what about our motives in our reception? If Michael Moore is using his bias to push information our way, we might be using our bias in rejecting it. I agree 100% that he abuses the word documentary and twists facts at times so that people cannot swallow his stuff as non-fiction. BUT, to toss aside the information presented would probably also be a mistake, and in my opinion would be driven by our desire to not be confronted by some of the things in his films. That's where our bias can effect the transfer of information.

The fact that some people who hear about slave labor in other countries say "well if it's really that bad they don't have to work there" or something along those lines is a perfect example. We don't want to be convicted, so we try to change the information so that it's more pallatable to us. So while we need to discern through what the film maker is trying to get us to believe, we need to figure out what we are actually TRYING to believe and fight through that for truth. Truth changes us. why? Because we're believing lies!!!

One other thought i had about something that was said last night was about the difference between watching a movie about depravity vs. watching it on the news. the newsabout depravity is trying to tell us what is going on out there. the movies about depravity are capable of showing us how to deal with what is going on out there, and giving us new insight. at least in my experience. people don't want to believe that's true b/c movies are just for entertainment, right? both are told with a bias, whether clear or unclear... but both still have something concrete to offer if we're willing to dig.

Friday, May 05, 2006

Good old Fashioned Love Story


My wife considers me to be a romantic guy. I always remember birthdays, anniversaries, special songs we've listened to, things like that. I tell you this so that you don't write off my thoughts further down the page as ramblings from an insensitive git. The main reason that I don't like most romantic movies is not because I don't find romance exciting, it's because I feel like they fail to deliver true romance.

There is a theme that runs through these movies which I feel people buy into pretty wholeheartedly. It glorifies your desires above all else. Any person who has had their desires infringed upon in any way is now an incomplete person, and it would be better for everybody if they found somebody who would make them complete. Or, it would be better for that person and not everybody, but that person is ultimately all that matters since that's who the star of the movie is. In fact, most of these movies involve the star being incomplete WITH somebody, not just simply incomplete all by themselves. It involves a choice between one person or another, one life or another is the way they sell it usually.

Think of some American romance movies... Casablanca, The Notebook, The Wedding Planner, Sleepless in Seattle, Brokeback Mountain... These types of movies tell the tales of people who either became complete by leaving their relationships with another, OR the tragic ones where they would've had they only but they never did so look how sad it is.

We worship ourselves and our desires naturally. Which is why this notion appeals to us above all others, that my needs are ultimately the most important. But when we give into this kind of thinking, we never will be complete no matter what choice we make or how many soul mates we find. Hollywood wants you to feel that getting everything your heart desires is what you should do, b/c they want you to buy the popcorn and soda that your heart desires.

The story is in the telling, and any of these romance stories could be told as horribly sad dramas if the other perspective was taken. We could watch Sleepless in Seattle from Bill Pullman's side of things, which is that he's a terribly nice fellow who's found his dream girl in Meg Ryan. He loves her with his whole heart and she leaves him all alone. Then he spirals down into a deep depression always blaming himself for the loss of his one true love, and the movie ends when he jumps off the empire state building to his death. Then the camera pans over and sees Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks holding hands for the first time. We would hate them. But we don't. We love them because their story is our story. Bill Pullman doesn't exist in our minds because he got in the way of the completion of Meg Ryan.

The things that you sacrifice for are the only things worth living for. It's through sacrifice that true romance is born.

Sunday, April 30, 2006

How did we learn to stop worrying?

Last night we watched the film "Dr. Strangelove OR How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb." It was directed by Stanley Kubrick, who I believe to be one of the greatest filmakers ever. The discussion afterwards ranged all over the place, covering several topics briefly. I'd like you all to feel free now to explore things more in depth.

There were so many good topics that came up last night (Nazi's. Communists, whether Evan is anti-American or not, whether human beings can be perfected, passifism, fear, security, paranoia, American History) that it's hard to pick one to start with. But my favorite thing about last night is that we sat there and watched a movie that is 43 years old which accomplished its purpose in us still today. That happened because of 2 reasons. 1. The art itself was great 2. We were willing to access it Now, a notion exists within all of us young people that this movie is the exception to the rule. That most older films don't actually have that number 1 quality to them, and therefore we don't have the 2nd quality when approaching them.

This kind of thinking puts us into a downward spiral that never fully appreciates the past, always just wants the latest and greatest thing. Learning from yesterday seems boring and almost impossible at times. Let's think about it. They were trying to do very similar things, which is to get their thoughts/ideas/stories across through a motion picture. Most of us believe that we do it much better now, so we'd rather browse the new release wall than to scan the older sections. Frankly (sorry Dan) I don't agree that we always do it better now. Especially since most films I see are simply re-creations of older ones who had a lot more original ideas.

Once again, we see that great art requires discipline on our part in order to engage with it. If it's spoon fed, it's nothing great.

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

If Uncle Walter was President

I want to talk for a bit about Presidential elections. Especially since there isn't one currently happening, we can talk about it a little differently (hopefully). Two candidates run, and the American people all have the power to choose one or the other. How do we decide who to cast a vote for? Or how do we decide if we're even to vote at all?

We don't know the candidates personally (most likely). We don't know anybody who does know them personally (most likely). So the information that we have about them is directly (or indirectly) passed to us from different forms of media. There are also certain issues which seem more important to the average American, so debates and interviews seem geared on prying into a candidates views on certain issues. The thinking is, "If we can't know them, we want to know what they think about what I think is important." Is there a better way to make our decisions? If not, then what's important to us?

Ever since I was a kid, most of the people that I've known who voted were very drawn to the issue of abortion. I've seen many people cast their vote almost purely based on this issue, or certainly it was heavily weighted. I would like to understand this kind of thinking a little bit better. I am in no way trying to say that abortion is an issue that doesn't matter, or that it's not important. But I've never seen a President actually play a major role in this issue. No President has single-handedly made abortion legal, and no President has ever over-turned legalized abortion. I know that they could somehow be connected in a loose way by electing a Supreme Court Justices who shares their views on this issue. But, since Pro-Life people are still holding their breath on that miracle snowball effect to take place... maybe the issues that are dealt with most directly by our Presidents during their terms should be the ones that we care the most about when placing our votes.

Then for those who don't vote at all... nobody needs to defend themselves, but since all we hear all our life is how people died to give you the right to do it and all that jazz, what are some reasons not to?

Abortion is something that people (on both sides) are extremely passionate about, and I'd say for good reason. But is the President the best avenue for getting your side of that issue upheld? At times it seems like we're voting on which plumber we want working on our pipes based on which of the 2 local dentists he supports. It might be important for a plumber to pick which dentist he wants to go to, but it has very little outcome on how your pipes are going to work after he leaves your house.